Having a preferred kicking and jumping leg it would seem obvious to have a stronger and a potential weaker leg.
From a technical and tactical perspective it seems interesting to have dominantly left footed players (like Robben), playing on the right and vice versa (like Ribery). However, are there any consequences with regards to a health (injury/injury prevention) or performance perspective?
Generally, limb length (7 - see references below), range of motion/flexibility (7, 14), strength (7, 8, 13, 14) and other movements (such as the FMS (16), kick/kicking velocity (12), step-down or single leg squat (3), balance (1)) were measured throughout the literature.
The most common measurements however utilized an isokinetic dynamometer (8, 13, 17) to test hip flexor (12), knee flexor (5, 8, 14, 17) and extensor (5, 8, 12, 14), hip (14), trunk muscles in concentric (14) and/or eccentric (14) motions with different speeds such as 60, 120, 240 degrees/second (5). Comparisons are made between muscle groups of the opposite leg (preferred vs. non-preferred leg) (12, 14) in different movement velocity. As a result there are multiple combinations of the mentioned variable that have been used throughout the literature.
It was shown that the preferred side was weaker than the non-preferred leg (14) in knee extension and flexion muscle strength, however, no differences were found for hip flexibility in English Premier league professional (14).
Interestingly, poor performers in the FMS showed bilateral differences, while the good performers did not in German professional footballers (16). In addition, it seems that training experiences (years played football) showed an affect on asymmetries, with more experienced players showed less dysbalance between the preferred vs. the non-preferred kicking leg in professional footballers from Greece (8).
There were also no dysbalances in various testing velocity muscle contraction types and/or muscle groups in another study utilizing similar participants (professional football players of the first Greek division) (17).
It was concluded that lopsided training lead to muscular imbalances which is generally regarded as an injury risk factor (14). In addition, limb length differences was reported as an intrinsic risk factors in football players (7), showing that asymmetries/dysbalances increased the hamstring strain injury risk 3.8-fold.
It seems that there is a few scientific research with regards to imbalances in youth/young footballers which reveals conflicting results.
Mognoni et al. (12) suggest strength imbalances between the dominant vs. the non-dominant knee extensors, with the non-dominant limb inherent of the greater strength.
Chin et al. (4) did not observe any isokinetic strength differences for the knee extensors however in the knee flexors between dominant and non-dominant limbs in elite Asian junior football players.
Kellis et al. (10) tested talented Greek football players aged 10-17 and found significant strength imbalances for knee flexors and extensors between dominant and non-dominant limbs. From the data I calculated a maximum of asymmetries of 11% between the dominant vs. non-dominant leg.
Capranica et al. (2) did not report any limb asymmetries in 10-year old footballers.
Kirkendall (11) stated in 1985 that football players need to stay within the clinical norms (10%) in contralateral muscle imbalance to avoid sport injuries. Dauty et al. (6) stated that concentric hamstring torque asymmetry of more than 10% identified the injured soccer players.
However, Fowler et al. (10) stated that 20% differences in bilateral muscle strength in professional footballers were seen as a risk factor.
Croisier et al. (5) reported a bilateral strength differences for hamstring of 15% or more, constitutes an athletes at risk.
From the literature it seems very “hard” to give a defined answer about a direct link of preferred to non-preferred kicking leg asymmetries/dysbalances to injuries. From one perspective it seems
that limb asymmetries are a “normal” phenomenon in footballers.
However, as limb length and bilateral muscle strength were seen as intrinsic risk factors, it seems that there might be a link to injury, if the differences are relatively extreme.
My conclusion is, technical and tactical aspects are more important compared to the physical aspect. Furthermore, I also believe that training both legs/feet of the players also represent more modern football (especially in youth development), which might also in return lower preferred to non-preferred kicking leg asymmetries/dysbalances.
1. Brito, J., Fontes, I., Ribeiro, F., Raposo, A., Krustrup, P., and Rebelo, A. Postural stability decreases in
elite young soccer players after a competitive soccer match. Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine 13: 175-179, 2012.
2. Capranica, L., Cama, G., Fanton, F., Tessitore, A., and Figura, F. Force and power of preferred and
non-preferred leg in young soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 32: 358-363, 1992.
3. Chiaia, T.A., Maschi, R.A., Stuhr, R.M., Rogers, J.R., Sheridan, M.A., Callahan, L.R., and Hannafin, J.A.
A musculoskeletal profile of elite female soccer players. HSS J 5: 186-195, 2009.
4. Chin, M.K., So, R.C., Yuan, Y.W., Li, R.C., and Wong, A.S. Cardiorespiratory fitness and isokinetic
muscle strength of elite Asian junior soccer players. J. Sports. Med. Phys. Fitness. 34: 250-257, 1994.
5. Croisier, J.L., Forthomme, B., Namurois, M.H., Vanderthommen, M., and Crielaard, J.M. Hamstring
muscle strain recurrence and strength performance disorders. Am. J. Sports. Med. 30: 199-203, 2002.
6. Dauty, M., Potiron-Josse, M., and Rochcongar, P. Identification of previous hamstring muscle injury by
isokinetic concentric and eccentric torque measurement in elite soccer player. Isokinetics. Exerc. Sci. 11: 139-144, 2003.
7. Fousekis, K., Tsepis, E., Poulmedis, P., Athanasopoulos, S., and Vagenas, G. Intrinsic risk factors of
non-contact quadriceps and hamstring strains in soccer: A prospective study of 100 professional players. Br. J. Sports. Med. 45: 709-714, 2011.
8. Fousekis, K., Tsepis, E., and Vagenas, G. Lower limb strength in professional soccer players: Profile,
asymmetry and training age. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 9: 364-373, 2010.
9. Fowler, N.E. and Reilly, T. Assessment of muscle strength asymmetry in soccer players., in:
Contemporary Ergonomics. Lovesey, E.J., ed. London: Tyler and Francis, 1993, pp 327-332.
10. Kellis, S., Gerodimos, V., Kellis, E., and Manou, V. Bilateral isokinetic concentric and eccentric strength
profiles of the knee extensors and flexors in young soccer players. Isokinetics and Exercise Science 9: 31-39, 2001.
11. Kirkendall, D.T. The applied sports science of soccer. Phys Sportsmed 13: 53-59, 1985.
12. Mognoni, P., Narici, M.V., Sirtori, M.D., and Lorenzelli, F. Isokinetic torques and kicking maximal ball
velocity in young soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 34: 357-361, 1994.
13. Rahnama, N. and Babmbaeichi, E. Musculoskeletal assessment in soccer: A review. Journal of
Movement Sciences & Sports 1: 13-24, 2008.
14. Rahnama, N., Lees, A., and Bambaecichi, E. A comparison of muscle strength and flexibility between
the preferred and non-preferred leg in English soccer players. Ergonomics 48: 1568-1575, 2005.
15. Sannicandro, I., Rosa, R.A., De Pascalis, S., and Piccinno, A. The determination of functional
asymmetries in the lower limbs of young soccer players using the countermovement jump. The lower limb asymmetry of young soccer players. Science & Sports 27: 375-377, 2012.
16. Schmidtlein, O., Keller, M., and Kurz, E. Asymmetric FMS patterns in Germany's Bundesliga soccer
players, in: World Congress on Science and Soccer. Ghent, 2012.
17. Zakas, A. Bilateral isokinetic peak torque of quadriceps and hamstring muscles in professional soccer
players with dominance on one or both two sides. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 46: 28-235, 2006.